Director: Mark
Dacascos
Notable Cast:
Alexander Nevsky, Casper Van Dien, Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa, Tia Carrere, Mark
Dacascos, Matthias Hues, Don ‘The Dragon’ Wilson, Cynthia Rothrock, Olivier
Gruner, Dmitri Dyuzhev, Robert Madrid
It’s not very often that one gets the opportunity to watch a
Philippines/Russian co-production film that is an obvious love letter to the
action films of Golan-Globus from the 1980s, but that’s one of the strange
benefits of being a niche cinephile. For many people, that previous sentence
sounds like torture as they would have to wallow through cheesy dialogue, broad
caricatures that represent people, and the forced creativity of low budget film
making, but for others – like me – a film like Showdown in Manila satiates the B-movie cravings that arise from
exactly those things. Showdown in Manila
is not what a traditional critic would call a ‘good’ film, but it’s a film that
flexes its muscles when it comes to its A-list B-action cast and the throwback
mixed formula that it utilizes. As a film on its own, it does crumble under any
kind of legitimate critiques. However, with the right mindset and just a bit of
nostalgia, Showdown in Manila works
as a fun, cheesy, and entertaining 1980s throwback.
The dream team? Why the hell not? |
It’s not a huge step outside of the realm of possibility
that director Mark Dacascos would want to gather together a slew of the second-tier
action stars from decades past for an action film. The Expendables was a film that set this up as a kind of new
formula for success. Is it new? Not really, but it certainly is a fresh mark
for action fans pining for nostalgic moments. It’s this intention that is the
most clearly stated mark of Showdown in
Manila. This is a film meant to mix that nostalgia with a just a hint of
fresh blood. The structure of the film, which can be boiled down into two
halves, is based on classic action formulas. The first half introduces the
audience to Nickolay, played with the wooden charm of early Arnold Schwarzenegger
by Russian muscle mass Alexander Nevsky, as the usual burned cop turned private
detective and his partner Charlie, played by a strangely entertaining Casper
Van Dien, who’s only character trait is that he’s a playboy. They are given a
task to hunt down Aldric Cole, played by the always entertain Cary-Hiroyuki
Tagawa of Mortal Kombat fame, who just
so happens to be the villain who got Nickolay fired from the police force and
killed his team (fake gasp). The results are, pardon using the cinematic cliché,
so bad they’re good.
Get to the choppa...if we could afford one! |
In this first half, the film focuses a lot on just setting
up the two lead characters, mostly Nickolay, and the charming relationship
between them. Nevsky is wooden, sure, but in a weird way he’s balanced by the
sheer overacting of Van Dien as his partner and by the time they are going to ‘get
the team back together’ to stage a full on Golan-Globus inspired jungle siege
on the villain’s almost comically small compound with the rest of the glorified
cameos of B-action stars of yesteryear, the film has this weird energy that
worked for me. There are a lot of problems with the script, which under
develops every character and gives the loosest plot possible that patchwork
quilts a lot of clichés together, but my expectations were low enough and
the energy of the film is charming and funny enough to carry it much
further than expected.
Truthfully, the most disappointing elements of Showdown in Manila come from the very
sparse budget that doesn’t allow director Dacascos to utilize the film’s ambitious
action concepts in most of its sequences and the under used all star B-action
cast. Because the film has a lot of cast with most of the stars don't even show up until the last act, there isn’t a lot for them to do. Don ‘The Dragon’
Wilson and Cynthia Rothrock are not given nearly enough material that the
martial arts action fan in me wanted and even the villains, played by Tagawa and
Hues, show up for a few silly sequences and sort of patter out. Showdown in Manila could have been an
instant B-action classic with a bit more scripting behind it and a budget to
allow them to do more, but as is it’s more of a love letter to the action golden
age more than anything else.
It has begun! And ended! |
As I said, Showdown in
Manila is not a good film. It really isn’t. It’s cheesy as hell, the
writing is thin, and the characters barely constitute anything that would
resemble people beyond the basic shells of one. Yet, there’s a kind of fun
energy and love behind the film as a love letter to the B-action films of the
80s that hit all of the entertaining buttons for me. Call me crazy, but I had a
lot of fun with this film despite its horrific and derailing flaws.
This is a film that only a handful of people will truly enjoy
for what it is and you know who you are. If you are one of those people, then
by all means – check out what Showdown in
Manila has to offer. It’s not much, but it seems to know that and just does
its best to be the love letter it wants to be.
Written By Matt Reifschneider
No comments:
Post a Comment