Directed by: Clark Duke
Notable cast: Liam Hemsworth, Clark Duke, Vince Vaughn, John
Malkovich, Vicica A. Fox
Arkansas is the kind of movie that doesn’t come along
especially often, something compelling and intense, while being extremely quiet
and meditative. Existing like a Michael Mann script filmed by Vincent Gallo,
this film is (typically comedic) character actor Clark Duke’s feature writing
and directorial debut. And as far as that fact alone goes? I feel very badly
for Duke that this film came out at the point in history, it did because this
film should be making huge waves right now, and will likely at this point be
lost amongst our world’s current real crises. Which is a shame, because this
story of crime, vengeance, and miscommunication feels especially relevant to
its release year of 2020. Though in the interest of keeping this review
apolitical and timeless, it’s
worth noting that rumination on doing what it takes to survive, whether it’s
with honor, hook and crook, or lies, both direct and of omission, and the
fallout from all of those choices does feel like a message that could stand-in
any decade.
Liam Hemsworth (the not-Thor one) plays Kyle, a drug runner
for an affiliation of gangs in the American south, a kind of very loosely
“organized” crime group. He’s not much of a talker, and is quick to anger and
intimidation, but slow to actual violence. This contrasts strongly with his new
partner, Clark Duke’s Swin, who is a loud mouthed, jovial guy who prefers to
talk his way into and out of situations. He says he’s not much of a fighter,
but that’s okay because he and Kyle are going to be friends. “Everyone who
meets me wants to be my friend,” is his catchphrase insomuch as a dramatic
character can have one. The two are assigned to a trailer park where they
continue to smuggle drugs throughout the south guided by John Malkovich’s Bright,
a supposed subordinate to the mysterious Frog, and the middle man between the
enigmatic distributor ‘She,’ for the various points of sale more or less
anywhere south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Malkovich is playing slightly against type here, a pleasant
surprise, as the very low-key and generally genial “park ranger” who has some
strict rules for our boys, including not dating anyone from town (something
Swin is almost humorously quick to dismiss) but is otherwise incredibly
friendly. After a tense delivery involving a local distributor and his son, the
son follows Kyle and Swin back to their home, where he tries to rob Bright of
his stash, not knowing he was only a middle man. This goes very badly and ends
in the deaths of both Bright and the son which is discovered quickly by Kyle. They
decide to clean up, and since they did nothing wrong (save forgetting to watch
for a tail) feel no need to run, waiting for an opportunity to explain
themselves to Frog and trying to maintain the status quo otherwise.
From here the film transitions to decades earlier, where we finally
meet Frog played by Vince Vaughn, continuing an amazing streak of believable
and sympathetic, albeit brutal criminal characters. No two have been quite the
same and it’s kind of an astonishing mid-career niche he’s found for himself.
We come to understand how Frog came to power, having escaped one town to start
over elsewhere, under mentor Almond (in a l really good turn from The Wire’s
Michael Kenneth Williams). Almond gives Frog a carton of cigarettes and
tells him to make it a business by the end of the week. Clever and ambitious,
Frog not only is able to accomplish this task, but does so too well, running
out of cigarettes rapidly. Almond thinks he’s teaching Frog a lesson about making
use of the stock available, but Frog thinks his growth is being stunted and
betrays his mentor, taking over his business.
There is no particular writing, plotting or technical faults
to speak of. It’s not especially dynamically shot; nothing visually sticks out
in my mind. It’s not effects-heavy, nor is it shot in an amateurish way per se.
It really feels like something written for stage, but with the budget to film. Your
patience with this can definitely vary. As someone who unironically enjoys Baz
Luhrman movies, I’m the first to admit being partial to the visual part of
motion pictures. That is, however, a personal taste and nothing in how this is
shot is wrong, either.
This is not a movie for everyone. It is genre fiction
strictly speaking, and it will have a definite cult appeal. It’s not the kind
of cult movie one typically thinks of with that term, being more in line with
the small, but extremely devoted fanbase something like The Way Of The Gun
gets. Like I said up top, this is something that I think would’ve gotten some
word of mouth business and even awards buzz in a different year where the film
news cycle isn’t entirely dominated by what is and isn’t being moved around. The
kind of landscape where a scrappy indie crime drama could break out, even a
weird one. As it stands, and like I said it will definitely find its audience
eventually anyway, one that’s going to be a devoted one that I count myself
among. At the very least, this is an easy movie to recommend to anyone that
values plot, writing and acting above all else, and I cannot emphasize enough
that the themes of communication, or lack of it, are really strong and have
left me thinking about it days later.
Written By Sean Caylor
No comments:
Post a Comment